When booking resort reservations at Walt Disney World, Disneyland & beyond, Disney Vacation Club is now requiring members certify that the reservation is being made for personal use only. This coupled with updated terms & conditions strongly suggests that DVC is finally cracking down on ownership interests being used for commercial purposes.
This is the latest step in a multi-decade saga that dates back to at least the mid-aughts aimed at reducing abuse and misuse of DVC ownership interests that are detrimental to the membership at large. Frustration among regular ole Disney Vacation Club members who rent out points for personal use seems to have bubbled over in recent years, with angry owners bringing it up at the Annual Condo Association Meeting and in various online forums.
The crux of the issue is that Disney Vacation Club has seen a proliferation of members who only have an ownership as a business venture–never using it for their families or friends. You know that old adage about not viewing DVC as an investment? Well, they do in a very literal sense.
Not only do these commercial renters own thousands of points (perhaps tens of thousands?), but they are incredibly efficient at exploiting loopholes and “maximizing” their ownership interests in ways that enhance its commercial value. Things like walking reservations, min-maxing speculative bookings for higher ROI, and more. (Not going to delve into this because I don’t really want this to be a blueprint for bad behavior.)
Even if these behaviors aren’t technically against the rules, they are against the spirit of the membership. And commercial activity most certainly violates the letter of the DVC ownership documents, too. The Public Offering Statement has reflected this for years, indicating that Disney Vacation Club ownership is for personal use only, and that owners should not engage in any commercial activity related to their interest.
With that said, there’s also ambiguity in what constitutes commercial activity. These documents also state that “Members may rent their Vacation Points. However, the use of your Vacation Points for commercial purposes is expressly prohibited.” There’s nothing that specifically defines commercial use; it’s always been open to interpretation at Disney’s discretion.
That brings us to the latest changes–the most major policy adjustment we’ve seen DVC make in years aimed at targeting rentals (they’ve made plenty aimed at restricting resales). Effective as of June 2025, Disney Vacation Club has updated the Terms and Conditions associated with making online reservations using DVC points. Here are the pertinent parts of the changes:
“You agree that any reservations made under your membership are solely for personal use and not for commercial purposes, as required by governing documents for each DVC Resort, including but not limited to the Declaration of Condominium and Membership Agreement. DVCM reserves the right to interpret personal use and determine if reservations are booked for personal or commercial purposes in its sole discretion.”
“Personal use may include enjoying the benefits of a DVC Membership with family or allowing use of any reserved Vacation Home to friends and family on occasion. Additionally, personal use means that the member does not regularly or frequently rent/sell reservations booked using their membership.”
“In addition, Disney reserves the right to cancel or modify a reservation (including after the reservation has been confirmed) if the reservation includes or resulted from a mistake or error of any kind, if Disney confirms that a reservation was made for commercial purpose and not for personal use, or where it appears that a guest has engaged in fraudulent or misleading activity in making the reservation. If a reservation is cancelled by Disney, Disney shall have no responsibility beyond the refund of monies paid to Disney and/or Vacation Points used, for the reservation.”
Along with this, there’s a new checkbox on the DVC Member website during the final stage of the booking flow that requires owners to click a checkbox certifying the following: “I agree to the Disney Vacation Club Terms and Conditions, and I attest that this reservation is for personal use only.”
This is the only new acknowledge of the change that we’ve spotted on DVCMember.com. However, we’ve heard from other members that there’s virtually the same attestation required when booking reservations over the phone.
DVC Member Services also seems to be asking follow-up questions to confirm the relationship of the guest to the member (the member themselves, family, friends, or a rentee). This added specificity is not part of the online booking flow, signaling that more changes might be on the horizon.
One thing to note is that this does not prohibit the renting of Disney Vacation Club points. We’re thankful this isn’t the case, as one of the strengths of DVC membership is its flexibility. And while we’ve never rented out any points, I could foresee a day when we might need to do so. By contrast, we’ve rented points on several occasions to supplement our own annual allotment (when borrowing has proven insufficient).
What this prohibits is commercial renting of points, which is pattern of behavior. Those who are regularly and repeatedly renting out points for financial gain, and seldom using the ownership interest for their own families are those being targeted. While there’s no bright-line rule (presumably because many of these are sophisticated businesses that would tailor their behavior to fall on the “right” side of that), it should be fairly easy to surmise based on intent and frequency.
If you’re mostly using your DVC points and are only renting them out on rare occasion, you’re likely fine. It’s a smell test type of deal–you should know right now whether or not you’re a commercial renter. (If you somehow don’t know, you probably aren’t.)
Our Commentary
Despite signs that it would, we’re still surprised to see this happen. That’s because this has been a known issue for years. Well over a decade. Maybe since the advent of AOL and online message boards? Over 7 years ago, we first published: Why is Disney Vacation Club Availability So Limited?
That was aimed at addressing a range of questions concerning availability (or lack thereof) at or beyond the 7-month mark, commercial activity, Walt Disney World selling cash rate rooms at Deluxe Villas despite no rooms showing on the DVC engine and countless other complaints. We had heard from a lot of readers about how DVC had become a “scam” due to the lack of availability, and sought to explain the issues–plural–that led to that point. Judging by the 125+ reader comments, it was a hot topic–and continues to be one.
One of those problems was less breakage, and one of the reasons for less breakage was owners renting out their unused Disney Vacation Club points. Other issues included an imbalance in resort/room categories and a pool of points that was less desirable and had lower utilization. Thankfully, this problem has become less pronounced in the years since thanks to dilution (although I do wonder whether the Cabins at Fort Wilderness might reverse that). At the same time, you could easily argue that point rental has worsened.
Given all of that, Disney Vacation Club seemingly had ample incentive to crack down on commercial rental of DVC points. That main reason I believed it wouldn’t happen is, quite simply, because it hadn’t already. This has been a known issue for as long as I can remember–and I could’ve sworn that it was a consideration when we were first debating buying into DVC.
It turns out that was accurate. Back on December 31, 2007, Disney Vacation Club amended the Public Offering Statement to clarify what constitutes commercial renting of points (via DVC News). That new commercial use policy made clear that DVC memberships are intended for personal vacation use. It reiterated that using the ownership interest for “commercial purposes,” then defined as a pattern of rental activity or other occupancy that could conclude constitutes a commercial enterprise or activity, is strictly prohibited.
The Public Offering Statement then went on to offer a new guideline that any DVC Member who makes more than 20 reservations in any 12-month period, shall be required to prove that all of those reservations are for the use of accommodations by the DVC Member, the DVC Member’s family and/or the DVC Member’s friends, and not for commercial purposes.
If such a DVC Member is unable to conclusively establish that, all reservations in excess of the first 20 reservations shall be presumed to be the use of Vacation Accommodations for commercial purposes in violation of the Declaration and the Membership Agreement. This was at a time when reservations were made by phone, and DVC Member Services simply would not confirm a reservation absent such a showing. This was then known as the “Multiple Reservation Rule.”
Digging back through contemporaneous forum posts, the reaction to that news back in January 2008 was eerily similar to the reaction to June 2025’s crackdown on commercial renting. It was supposedly a big problem then, and many members were annoyed by how pervasive commercial renting had become. It was a problem that needed to be stopped before it got even more out of hand. (If only those posters could see nearly two decades into the future!)
The only issue? In combing through more posts, I could find exactly zero instances of owners having DVC Member Services refuse to confirm a reservation or cancel a booking. Of course, part of this could be a matter of self-selection, as owners engaging in a pattern of commercial renting probably aren’t going to go into a hostile audience and air their grievances–that might fall on deaf ears.
But I would’ve expected to read or hear at least some reports of this happening over the last couple of decades. After all, there’s a lot of chatter about just how the commercial renters manage their memberships in order to run them like bona fide business investments. Given that, I think it’s fairly safe to say enforcement of that 2007 rule change was minimal, at most.
That’s more or less my reason for skepticism that Disney Vacation Club would or will actually do anything about commercial renting. It stands to reason that they already would have enforced existing policies if there was an appetite to do so. The fact that they haven’t suggests to me that there are legal concerns about enforceability or about the unintended consequences of such a crackdown.
With regard to the former point, I won’t pretend to be an expert in timeshare law, but it strikes me as possible that none of this is legally enforceable. That the original contract language is insufficient for DVC to prevail if this were challenged in court, and all the subsequent guidelines and policy changes are simply a scare tactic. It’s not at all uncommon for lawyers to send toothless cease & desists or demand letters with zero intentions of ever acting upon them.
In this scenario, DVC would be bluffing in the hopes that at least some percentage of commercial renters will be given pause about the change and voluntarily exit the market, and that will have a sufficiently positive impact on availability that members take notice. Conversely, what DVC might be doing is playing 4D chess here, trying to reduce confidence in the DVC rental market among prospective rentees.
This news has already garnered a lot of traction and many Walt Disney World fans are risk averse. I could see a not insignificant number opting against renting DVC points due to the risk and uncertainty introduced by this new policy. If Disney were really smart, they would strategically cancel a handful of reservations and leak word of doing so.
Even if that resulted in litigation from commercial renters, it would arguably be worth it from Disney’s perspective in reducing confidence in the DVC rental market. That’s the cost of doing business, and there’s a decent chance those commercial renters couldn’t afford to take on Disney in court, even if they had a compelling case.
Or maybe this policy is simply being introduced to assuage annoyed members that DVC is making a good faith effort at eliminating commercial renting. So the next time someone inevitably asks this question at the December Condo Association Meeting, DVC leadership can point to this policy and hang up the ole ‘mission accomplished’ banner.
The other possibility is that Disney Vacation Club is concerned about the second order consequences of cracking down on commercial activity. I have no clue how many points are in the hands of for-profit businesses, but I’ll bet DVC has a pretty good idea! And if that number is as high as some rumors suggest, they might have very valid concerns about what happens if those points are suddenly liquidated via the resale market.
After all, resale prices don’t exist in a vacuum. We just discussed the 2025 math of purchasing Disney Vacation Club direct versus the resale market, and it’s a pretty close call once you get past the surface level price disparity. Well, that may cease to be the case if resale prices plummet due to a sudden influx of points. That drop could become even more of a self-fulfilling prophecy if non-commercial 2042 owners see values take a hit, and decide to cash out while the gettin’s good on top of the commercial exodus.
To be very clear, I have no idea whether this would happen in such a crackdown scenario. And I’ll be the first to admit that I have a history of expecting X or Y world event to have an adverse impact on resale prices. Since 2017, we’ve been waiting to time the market and purchase more points. (Huge mistake–but I guess buying during the Great Recession spoiled us.) I obviously don’t want the type of real world event that would normally trigger plunging prices…but I’ll concede that I’m salivating at the prospect of this new rule causing a ‘correction’ in DVC resale prices. Perhaps this point is purely wishful thinking on my part.
Nevertheless, the point does stand that Disney Vacation Club’s primary goal is to sell more points. Obviously, pesky little things like “member satisfaction” must also be taken into account, but if DVC were concerned the consequences an actual crackdown would have on demand and prices, that would explain a lot. That might be why they only paid face to prohibiting commercial activity back in 2007, and it could be precisely what’s happening again here. Make regular members feel better that DVC is trying with this new policy, while not actually doing anything on the enforcement side.
Hopefully I’m wrong. Maybe there’s a new legal team that is confident these terms & conditions can withstand scrutiny; perhaps management is more motivated to actually enforce this new policy. Another possibility is that things have gotten so bad that the risk to member satisfaction outweighs the second-order effects of the crackdown. That DVC essentially had no choice but to act here, as ignoring commercial renting will have even worse unintended consequences in terms of families selling their personal-use points or declining to add on at the Island Tower, Lakeshore Lodge, etc. I guess we shall see!
If you’re thinking about joining DVC, be sure to read our Ultimate Guide to Disney Vacation Club. This covers the pros & cons, resale v. direct, how much money you’ll save, and other important things to know before taking the plunge. If you still can’t decide whether membership is right for you, “try before you buy” with the recommendations in How to Save BIG on Deluxe Disney Accommodations Renting DVC Points.
YOUR THOUGHTS
What do you think about DVC’s crackdown on commercial renting? Optimistic that this isn’t just a scare tactic, and Disney Vacation Club is actually going to act this time around? Or do you think they don’t want to rock the boat, and this is more just about appeasing members who have complained? Have you had more difficulty in finding DVC availability in the last several years? Have you noticed certain resorts, room categories, or times of the year getting more competitive? Any firsthand experiences you care to share? Any other thoughts or tips to share? Any questions we can help you answer? Hearing feedback about your experiences is both interesting to us and helpful to other readers, so please share your thoughts below in the comments!
